Archive for December, 2001

"Empire Pig Building" and "Netherland’s City of Br…

“Empire Pig Building” and “Netherland’s City of Breeding”

Welcome to Netherland’s Deltapark in Rotterdam: Hey, scared pigs, you guys are going to stay in the lower levels of Deltapark’s super tower. I am sure it’s going to be easy to locate this large complex, six levels high; stuffed with pigs, chicken, fish, flowers, mushrooms and tomatoes: just follow the smell and the screaming of dying animals, the chit-chat of stressed-out chicken and roaring engines of loud trucks, carrying all these products to consumers all over in Europe and in the world. Sounds crazy? It is crazy but not crazy enough for Dutch movers and shakers to consider. Dutch agricultural minister Laurens Jan Brinkhorst believes that such a ‘agri-cultural’ park is going to be the future — and ‘organic’, even ’self-feeding’: What pigs and chicken drop before they’re on their way to the ice-box will help nurture vegetable as fertilizer. A pig could be born in the park, live there for a while, eat well and then it gets butchered, right on the spot — now, isn’t that efficient and also economic? Pigs and chicken live first class: little balconies help bringing in fresh air and keep those meaty power plants — I grew up with the saying: “Meat is a piece of the power of life!” — in shape. Consequently, because of this enormous space to play, the meat and muscles of the pigs will be more flexible and soft — yummmm! And the best argumentation I’ve read so far comes from the inventor of the Deltapark: If two legged (we human beings) lived in skyscrapers, why not also animals? Right. So, why not share a tower, have ‘animal farm’ one level above? We would never have to leave our house again — butcher’s right next door! Everything’s fresh and we’ll be healthier than ever!

But wait, the Deltapark inventor is already working on a new project: the ‘pig tower’. Really! This is going to be the “Empire Pig Tower”: 140.000 pigs on 40 levels…what a “Schweinerei” (note: when Germans get annoyed, they shout “Schweinerei” — “pig business!”): live high, die fast! so, little pigs, life IS exciting, hmm? And: who needs farmers? I mean, people who actually care?

Now, this is not a joke. It’s a mirror of society, of us. It could happen, these people are serious. It just shows that we’ve lost touch with the process of producing our food and it also documents a loss of values. What counts are results, deep red tomatoes that taste like a waxed paper box, filled with water, are so 90s. “Holland tomatoes” are ‘organic’ now but still, they are not ‘natural’. But we still have the choice: First grade Tomatoes or ‘first floor tomatoes’…who wants to live in a skyscraper anyway?

SocietyGuardian.co.uk | Society Guardian | Farm of the future? The scale is vast: imagine 10 football fields laid out in a rectangle, roughly 1km by 400 metres, and then six floors of equal area, a total of 200 hectares (500 acres) stretching skywards. Within the building would be animal production, aquaculture, vegetable and insect growing. The complex, known as Deltapark envisages 300,000 pigs, 1.2m chickens, tens of thousands of fish and a giant vegetable growing area all under one roof.

The pigs could inhale the sea breeze on the balcony, enjoying more space than in an average pig farm, and ending their days in the slaughterhouse downstairs. Space without daylight in the giant building could be used for cultivating mushroom and chicory which thrive in the dark.

Higher up, greenhouses full of tomatoes and flowers, grown in nutrient solutions collected from elsewhere in the building would profit from the light and, with wind turbines on the roof to power the whole thing, the system is theoretically a complete ecological farming cycle, with one activity feeding another and everything being recycled.

Leave a Comment

Germany: Sustainability framework introduced Germ…

Germany: Sustainability framework introduced

German Council for Sustainable Development just published their first paper on Germany’s sustainabilty goals: more efficient energy usage (reduce energy intensity in 2020 to 50% of intensity in 1990), more funds for research, increased care for kids and more. 21 indicators are designed for reality-checks along the way..download the paper here. (right now, it’s just in German, though). I’ll dive into this paper and will write some more about it later.

Generationengerechtigkeit, Lebensqualität, sozialer Zusammenhalt und internationale Verantwortung. Zu den Kennziffern gehören etwa Energie und Rohstoffintensität. Hier ist es Ziel, die Energieintensität zwischen 1990 bis 2020 um die Hälfte

Leave a Comment

Energy costs here’s an interesting list of curren…

Energy costs

here’s an interesting list of current costs to produce energy from renewable and fossil fuels. This list was compiled by members of the de.soc.umwelt-newsgroup. Follow the links to sources to verify and always double-check before you’ll throw them into discussions..;-)…I think this should give you some material for your argumentation..

nuclear energy

* nuclear fuel U3O8: 0.01 cents/KWh

* enriched fuel UO2: 0.07 cents/KWh

Coal

* Brown oal: ca. 0.44 cents/KWh

* International hard coal: 0.5-0.7 cents/KWh

* German hard coal: 1.7-1.9 cents/KWh

Oil (at 25$/barrel)

* regular petrol: 76 = 19 cents/ltr, right now (Dec.2001) 11.8 cents/ltr

* premium gasoline: 87 = 21.8 cents/ltr

* cerosine Jet Fuel: 76 = 19 cents/ltr

* aviation spirit: 120 = 30 cents/ltr

* heavy oil >1% sulphur: 42 = 10.5 cents/ltr

* heavy oil low sulphur: 50 = 12.5 cents/ltr

* heating oil: 72.8 = 18 cents/ltr

* Diesel: 73.0 = 18.2 cents/ltr

* low sulphur Diesel: 75.9 = 21.8 cents/ltr

* Propane gas: 44 = 11 cents/ltr

* crude oil: 1.1-1.3 cents/KWh

* fuel oil: 1.3-1.8 cents/KWh

* regular gas: 1.3-1.8 cents/KWh

* methanol: 1.8-2.2 cents/KWh

* FT synthetic petroleum: 2.7-3.6 cents/KWh

* fuel station gas Germany: ca. 0.9 Dollars/ltr = 10 cents/kWh

Gas

* petroleum gas: USA city boundary: ca. 0.9 cents/kWh

* petroleum gas liquid, LNG: ca. 1.8 cents/kWh

* Propangas: 1.2 cents/kWh

* hydrogen gaseous: 4.5-9 cents/kWh

* hydrogen liquid: 6.8-11.3 cents/kWh

http://www.ruhrgas.de/deutsch/ErdgasWirtschaft/Grundzuege/g06.htm

http://www.stuttgart.de/umwelt/abt5/energiebericht/eb98/eb98_45.htm

Power

* hydro-power: 0.9-1.8 cents/kWh

* nuclear: ca. 1.8-3.6 cents/kWh

* coal/oil/gas: ca. 2.7-3.6 cents/kWh

* windpower: ca. 6.8-13.6 cents/kWh

* photovoltaic: ca. 0.9 Dollars/kWh

compare:

* car engine: 22.7-45 Dollars/kW (typical running time: 2000-5000h)

* micro turbine (30-150kW): 450-1365 Dollars/kW

* fuel cells: 1365-3180 Dollars/kW

http://www.gri.org/pub/solutions/dg/apc.pdf

http://www.gri.org/pub/solutions/dg/pgen99.PDF

Leave a Comment

Germany prepares for Johannesburg summit There d…

Germany prepares for Johannesburg summit

There doesn’t seem much talk in the US on the up-coming world conference on sustainability in Johannesburg 2002 next September. Have a look at the speech of Mr. Volker Hauff, the leader of the German Council for Sustainable Development at the first national preliminary conference on the Johannesburg summit. This speech is in English and about an establishment of a world comission on sustainability and globalization. What are the Americans planning? Oh well, they are probably still ‘doing their research’…

by the way, I am in Germany (Munich) right now and will publish many dispatches live from Fatherland — after the Holidays..

Leave a Comment

Trucker Latin This is what I love about the usene…

Trucker Latin

This is what I love about the usenet: You get to listen to voices you would never hear on ‘mainstream media machine US’. Read former trucker Dale’s comments on his expenses and how the trucker business really works. No second hand, this is real life experience, his butt also could tell a story. Dale says: “Truck driving ain’t what you think it is — If you haven’t done it, You don’t understand it.” And he’s right. So many ’second hand’ smoker try to explain how great (or bad) smoking is … this guy talks about his experience..After reading his comments, you’ll know what Dale is all about. promise you.

Google Groups: View Thread So the economics of owning the truck is thus: My highest expense was the truck payment at apx $17,000 per year. My second largest expense is the one the group is interested in, My energy (fuel) cost. Determined of course by the price and the consumption level. I have had mpg calc’s as low as 4.5 MPG (miles per gallon) to as high as 9.5 MPG. Overall the calc was about 6.5 mpg.

Leave a Comment

German perspective: Oil consumption will decrease …

German perspective: Oil consumption will decrease 12 percent by 2020 — now compare!

I found this forecast below –the German blurb — from “Esso (ExxonMobil) Energy Forecast Germany 2001“(just in German..), issued in late September. In 2020 oil will be still number one (36% of total energy consumption) but natural gas right behind (34%).

To bring that into the big (US) picture, I searched for my old calculator and checked out the US situation. My first problem was to compare different units. But I did it! This is what I found out (my US data comes from the “Energy Blueprint on page 4″ by the Union of Concerned Scientists. I am quite sure they did their homework!):

Germany (total oil consumption):

2001: 127 mio. tons

2020: 121 mio. tons (Esso forecast)

US (total oil consumption: 1 quadrillion BTU x 25.2 = mio. tons):

2000: 960.12 mio tons (38.1 Quadrillion BTU*)

2010 (business-as-usual): 1.12 mio tons (44.4)

2010 (blueprint suggested): 1.09 mio tons (43.4)

2020 (business-as-usual): 1.28 mio tons (50.6)

2020 (blueprint suggested): 1.22 mio tons (48.3)

So much about “independence from oil”. basically, US oil consumption is going to rise nevertheless. Regarding the energy blueprint, renewable energies will generate at best 10.6 quadrillions btu (267.12 mio tons) by 2020 — now, that is 2.4 times more than the forecasted total German oil consumption in 2020. That’s remarkable!

ExxonMobil Central Europe Holding GmbH Primärenergieverbrauch

Bis zum Jahr 2020 nimmt der Mineralölverbrauch in Deutschland um 12 Prozent von 127 auf 112 Millionen Tonnen ab. Öl bleibt aber auch dann noch der Energieträger Nummer 1 mit einem Anteil von 36 Prozent am Primärenergieverbrauch. Im gleichen Zeitraum steigt der Verbrauch von Erdgas um 34 Prozent.

Leave a Comment

Germany: 40% less Co2 emissions by 2020 proposed …

Germany: 40% less Co2 emissions by 2020 proposed

Hey, look: Germany’s Governmental “Sustainability council” proposed some measures in preparation for “Johannesburg summit 2002″. 40% less Co2 emissions (compared to 1990) — current “official goal” is already to reduce CO2 emissions by 25% till 2005 (actually, Germany has already reduced CO2 by 18.7%, or 190 tons CO2 compared to’90) . Also: The council proposed to stop subsidies of coal production by 2010 — this is going to be the next battleground, I am afraid –, new aggressive energy conservation and renewable energy initiatives. Here are the details (just in German, so far — let me know if you need more info) German governments is going to propose their refined ’sustainability strategy’ in mid January. So stay tuned, I will report ‘live from Germany’!

Rat für Nachhaltige Entwicklung – Dokumente – Pressemitteilung – Subkontent Klare Zielvorgaben fordert der Rat für die Minderung des CO2-Ausstoßes pro Kopf: Bis zum Jahr 2020 soll für Deutschland eine Minderung von 40%, gemessen am Niveau von 1990, erreicht werden. Damit will der Rat über das bis heute definierte Ziel von 25% Reduktion bis 2005 hinausgehen: “Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft brauchen eine klare, langfristige Orientierung, damit sie sich darauf einstellen können”, so Hauff zur Begründung. Zur Realisierung dieses Ziels fordert der Rat einen sozialverträglichen Ausstieg aus der Steinkohle-Subventionierung bis 2010, eine neue Effizienzoffensive und einen Ausbau der erneuerbaren Energien.

Leave a Comment

US holds gathering on renewable energy: just a cha…

US holds gathering on renewable energy: just a charade?

Lot’s of fluff, not much substance and help from the US government. “Heisse Luft, nichts dahinter,” (Hot air, nothing behind it) as we say in German. Also read the interesting commentary in LA-Times.

U.S. Holds Gathering on Renewable Energy “Our shared mission is both simple and noble,” Ms. Norton said. “We must explore ways to better capture the sun’s light, the sky’s winds, the land’s bounty and the earth’s heat to provide energy security for America’s families.”



(But) Critics said that the session today was little more than window dressing and that administration policies still favored the extractive industries, particularly oil and coal. The critics noted that the administration sought to cut federal money for research and development into renewable energy sources by 50 percent and that most of the $34 billion in tax breaks in the House energy bill, which the administration supports, would go to the oil, coal, gas and nuclear industries.



Ms. Norton, surrounded by energy experts from other federal agencies, made no commitment on government action and did not discuss conservation or tax credits for renewable sources, a program that many manufacturers seek. Instead, she asked the manufacturers what the problems were in developing renewable energies on federal land.

Leave a Comment